When trying to decide what exactly my main claim should be for this assignment, I found it very difficult to think of which claim to use (I began with an idea of using two of the three main claims), and how to go about writing it. I want to argue that it is irrelevant to have nude photos on the cover of a ESPN magazine because they are, as a company/network, focused on sports, not sex and models. With that said, I chose to use a claim of policy. So, this is what I came up with:
Rather than giving off an idea that there is a correlation between nudity and sports on the cover of a sport issued magazine, ESPN should be focusing on providing suitable photos of athletes to their spectators of whom are of all ages.
I chose this to be my main claim because it elaborates on my argument of why it makes no sense to create a comparison of nudity and sports on the front cover of a sports magazine and why it should change. I realize that it is "The Body Issue," but it is created by the famous sports network, ESPN. I also added that their readers, or viewers, are of, or could potentially be of, all ages. I am a huge sports fan, especially basketball, and if I was a child and saw the WNBA player Candice Parker naked, on the front cover of a sports magazine, what ideas would come to my mind? Perhaps I need to pose nude to be good at performing in basketball. Or, I am not "cool" unless I pose naked for magazines. Children have creative minds and who knows what they could assume from seeing this type of advertising. There is much to argue on this topic, in my mind, but I will stop at that.





